![]() ![]() Going back to the Vienna Gambit proper, remember that Black can accept the gambit and walk into 4.If your concern is that it's riskier than you prefer, consider the following: Bc4, and in chess we don't have the luxury of always getting exactly the flavor of game we'd like. e5 ideas found in the Vienna Gambit, but I think you'll find that the character is about as close as you're going to get to the Vienna Gambit without risking the boring Na5 lines of 3. Granted that it's a transposition to the King's Gambit where Black can take the pawn freely without fear of 4. My recommendation is to take a closer look at 1. Once again, playable, but not in the spirit of the Vienna Gambit. g3 is a much slower and less forceful way to achieve f2-f4 and results in positions of a very different character from developing the Bf1 to c4 or b5.Qg4!, so this could be a workable choice in club-level blitz, but "hope chess" should never be the basis of a repertoire decision. In practice, a lot of players unfamiliar with the Vienna will instead give you 3. The resulting position is playable, but as with the Four Knights, generally not much fun for the sort of player who'd opt for the Vienna to begin with. f4 without gambitting the pawn, but indeed, Black can and should spoil your fun by trading off your bishop with Na5 as soon as you've played d3. Bc4 Vienna because of the fairly reliable prospect of getting 5. Before switching to the Vienna Gambit, I was originally drawn to the 3. Nf3 definitely isn't what you want! If you were comfortable/happy with 3.Taking into account that your preferred line is the Vienna Gambit, and that you'd like to be able to deal with alternatives to 2. Nc6, I generally agree with your assessment of each candidate move, and I don't see that you have much real choice apart from those four. I picked up the Vienna Gambit a year ago and ran into the same quandary over 2. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |